---------------------------------------------------------
Jamada al-Awwal 18, 1426/June 25, 2005 #49
---------------------------------------------------------
New Trend
Analysis
Iraqi
Collaborator Ibrahim al-Jaafari's Visit with President
Bush
June 23 and 24, 2005 was our first opportunity to look at
Ibrahim al-Jafaari who is being presented as Iraq's Prime Minister.
Here is new Trend's analysis of him:
-
He is working "hand-in-glove" with the Bush administration.
There is not the slightest hint of any independence in him.
-
In some respects he is worse than Kabul's Karzai.
He kept talking of U.S. led "democracy."
He claims to be a Muslim devoted to
Islam
but did not talk with any Islamic references.
-
Democracy is a meaningless word in Iraq where the
U.S.
has destroyed entire cities and killed tens of thousands of people.
How can any decent person talk of democracy in Iraq, Iraqis say,
when military operations are carried out every week with the
full force of U.S. military power.
-
Ibrahim al-Jaafari is a disgrace to Islam in general and to Shi'ism
in particular. He should be judged from the point of view of
Hazrat Ali, r.a., the fourth Caliph, of Imam Husain, the martyred
grandson of the Prophet, of Imam Khomeini, the leader of modern Shi'ism,
and even Moqtada al-Sadr, the leader of Shi'I resistance in Iraq.
On all counts, he turns out to be ZERO.
-
Al-Jaafari tried to prove that he is more extreme than President Bush
himself. While Bush refers to the Iraqi resistance as "insurgents,"
Al-Jaafari insists that they are not insurgents but "terrorists."
Thus Al-Jaafari is out of step with the entire world of Islam
which is proud of the Islamic resistance in Iraq.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Racism
in America
Why was Nothing done for 41 Years? Why this timing?
Will Killen's Sentencing Fool the African American Community?
by
Kaukab siddique
Suddenly the U.S. government dragged an 80 year old man out of his
bed, convicted him for "manslaughter" in the murder of three
African Americans 41 years back and sentenced him to 60 years in prison.
[He was brought to court in a wheel chair with an oxygen tube in his nose.]
Is the government trying to say that it wants justice for the
oppressed people of America? If so, then the government officials
who did not try a murderer for 41 years should be brought to trial.
Who does not know that "justice delayed is justice denied."
If the man was a cold blooded murderer, it is not right to convict
him only of "manslaughter." Then the 60 year sentence is an absurdity
too when one realises that killen is 80 years old.
The question arises: what was the political motivation behind this
show of justice? If the government is interested in justice, here
are a few essentials:
-
Almost every month young Black men are shot to death by police
officers on "suspicion" of danger. No police officer has been
brought to justice, other than a few "suspensions" and a couple
of demotions. Police killings and serious beatings of young
Black males are a countrywide phenomenon. Every young Black man
in a fancy car faces profiling and potential arrest.
-
In ever big city, drugs have been introduced into the Black
community leading to the ongoing ugly situation of young Black
men shooting each other to death over drug deals. A country which
can send an armada of 150,000 troops to introduce "democracy"
into Iraq cannot stop [or claims it cannot stop] the inflow of
drugs into America's inner cities. Is this justice?
-
AIDS has spread through the African-American community. Why is no
major effort underway to stop this ongoing tragedy? If $87 BILLION
can be spent to subdue Iraq and buy thousands of collaborators,
why can't a few billions be spent on the health problems right here?
-
Instead we see the systematic infusion of the idea by way of
media
that homosexuality is as "normal" as heterosexuality into the
African-American communities. Isn't this a form of cultural genocide?
-
To top it all, we have the drum beat of abuse and denigration aimed
at the Black woman. Is it just a coincidence that the mainstay of
the resistance to slavery, the BLACK MOTHER, is being destroyed by
the use of the word "bitch" for just about every Black woman?
Isn't every woman potentially also a mother, the cultural force
which could survive slavery? Is it not true that the power
structure is giving instant success to those who produce CDs
which literally and metaphorically unclothe the African American woman?
This constant harping on the events of the civil rights movement
are a deception and a digression from the issues at hand.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Italy Uncovers Torture Link Between
CIA
&
Egypt's
Mubarak Regime
From New Trend's
Media
Monitor
CBS Evening News reported on June 2, 2005 that Italy has arrested
13 CIA agents. It appears that the CIA kidnaped an Islamic activist
from Egypt, Abu Omar, in broad daylight, in Italy, and flew him to
Germany
and then to Cairo, Egypt. ABU OMAR WAS TORTURED in EGYPT for TWO YEARS.
The euphemism "rendition" is used by the U.S. government for such
activities which are a violation of international law and a crime
against humanity owing to the torture involved.
This is the reality of the links between the corrupt
Mubarak
regime and the Bush administration. Now Mubarak is claiming that
he is going to hold "free elections" in Egypt and has been endorsed
by Ms. Condileeza Rice
Elements of the secularist "opposition" and the "Muslim Brotherhood"
which sold out long ago are cooperating with Mubarak in this game
of deception. The Islamic movement, led by
Dr. Omar 'Abdel Rahman,
the blind scholar in a U.S. prison, is not part of this farce.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Egyptian-American Ahmed 'Abdel Sattar's Family Calls for
Letters
to Judge Asking for Leniency
[Dear Muslims: asalamu alaikum. Please read this letter from
Br. Ahmed's attorney carefully and then write your letter.
The letters should be sent to the attorney, not to the Judge,
before August 1. Sentencing will be carried out in September -
Editor's note.]
From:
Kenneth Paul, attorney
666 third avenue new york, new york IOOI7
TEL. (212) 697-4090 FAX (2121 972-4654
verdictlaw@aol.com
June 8, 2005
To the Friends of Ahmed Abdel Sattar
This firm represents Ahmed Abdel Sattar. As you may know by now,
Ahmed has been found guilty of terrorism-related counts in the
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.
Mr. Sattar will appear in court again in September 27, 2005 to
be sentenced by United States District Judge John G. Koeltl who
has significant discretion in terms of the length and conditions
of Ahmed's punishment. Of course, Judge Koeltl will impose a
sentence that he believes to be fair and just, based on all
the circumstances. With your assistance, however, we hope to
convince the Court to impose a sentence at the lowest end of
Ahmed's guideline range.
We are asking Ahmed's friends and acquaintances -- those who know
him and his background best -- to address letters to Judge Koeltl,
informing him of the high regard in which Ahmed is held in the
community as well as by those who have come to know him well.
While you should certainly feel free to write whatever you
honestly believe to be true about Ahmed, the following
considerations might be helpful for you to keep in mind as
you write your letter.
Your letter should be addressed to:
Hon. John G. Koeltl, U.S.D.J. United States Courthouse
500 Pearl Street, New York, New York 10007
We would appreciate your sending your letter to us, not directly
to the Court, because we intend to collect and assemble all of
the letters and to submit them all at the same time. The Court
will undoubtedly find letters like yours easier to assimilate, as
well as more meaningful and impressive, if they arrive at the same
time, rather than piecemeal.
We also believe that there is a greater chance that a single
letter sent directly to the Court can be overlooked or misplaced.
We should receive your letter no later than August 1, 2005, as
letters received after that date might be too late to help Ahmed.
Your letter should indicate at the outset that you are writing
in connection with Ahmed Abdel Sattar's sentencing, and that you
are aware that Ahmed has been found guilty. There is no point to
be served by telling the Court that you believe that Ahmed is
innocent, since he has already been found guilty. Instead, it
is very important that Judge Koeltl appreciate that, despite
your knowledge that Ahmed has been found guilty, you continue
to hold him in high esteem.
Your letter should identify who you are and your position
in the community; how and where you are employed, if you are,
how long you have known Ahmed Abdel Sattar, and the circumstances
of how you have come to know him. For example, you may be a
relative, neighbor or business associate of Ahmed, or you may
know him from religious activities, or because your children
and his are or were playmates. It makes no difference so long
as your identity and the nature of your relationship with Ahmed
are clearly explained.
It would be most helpful to the Court, and therefore to
Ahmed Abdel Sattar, if your letter reveals in detail specifically
why you and others hold Ahmed in high esteem. If you can recall
any particular incident or event that reveals Ahmed's good
character, do not hesitate to describe it no matter how
insignificant it might seem to you now. Often, it is just
such seemingly minor incidents (e.g. helping you or your child
when you needed it; assisting at work; participating in community
or family events or in religious affairs) that capture the true
character of a person. You should avoid, however, merely writing
your unsupported conclusion that Ahmed is a good person,
without giving the reasons why you think so.
Your letter does not have to be long, nor should you worry that
your letter is too long. It need not be typewritten, so long as
you write clearly, and only on one side of a page, however many
pages you choose to write.
What is most important is that you write sincerely and truthfully.
Finally, a letter like the one we are asking you to write
inevitably takes longer than you think, particularly if they
are going to be meaningful.
We would therefore appreciate it if you would start drafting
your letter immediately so that we will be sure to receive it
by August 1, 2005. We must stress again that letters received
after that date might be too late to help Ahmed.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel
free to call me and I shall try to answer them. With your
assistance, we are hopeful that Judge Koeltl will have
sufficient knowledge about Ahmed's fine qualities and
exemplary prior conduct, so that he will impose the fairest
and most appropriate sentence in his case. In our view,
Ahmed Abdel Sattar has earned and deserves lenient treatment
from the Court.
Thank you, in advance, for your cooperation.
Very truly yours,
Kenneth Paul, attorney
----------------------------------------------
Taliban Resurgent
Media
Reporting on the Return of the Taliban
U2s Do Not Crash by accident: It was returning from
Afghanistan
by New Trend's Media monitor
U.S. media started reporting on the new fighting in Afghanistan
in May 2005. Most of these reports are brief and indicate two
aspects of the fighting:
-
The attacks are being carried out by the Taliban with U.S. troops
on the defensive.
-
All the attacks are small scale but they have created a steady
flow of U.S. casualties, with an average of one to three killed
and 4 to 8 wounded.
-
Suddenly, last week, the U.S. announced that it hit the Taliban
twice by air, killing 40 in one attack and 60 in the other.
-
These days the Taliban are openly commenting to
Pakistani
media on the fighting. Lutfullah Hakeemi, the Taliban spokesman,
categorically denied that there had been any such incidents in
which the U.S. claims it killed so many Taliban.
-
Our analysts say that just about all reports indicate that the
Taliban, like a practiced guerrilla force, do not travel in groups
of more than 10 or maximum 20. Thus the U.S. claims are most
probably the result of wish fulfilment concocted in Kabul and
could well be civlian casualties resulting from U.S. air raids.
-
U.S. media do not report losses inflicted on Afghan collaborators
by the Taliban. For this New Trend depends on Pakistan's Urdu press.
The boldest move by the Taliban was their swift takeover of a
district heaquarter in the Kandahar area where they captured 31
police officers. Of these the district police chief Nanai and his
7 body guards, known for their atrocities against villagers, were
tried by Sharia court and executed. The rest were released.
-
Recently, U.S. media reported that a U2 spy plane crashed while
landing at its air base in the United Arab Emirates. Most media
did not note, with one exception, that the plane was returning
from a mission in Afghanistan. The plane's pilot was killed in
the crash, indicating that hostile fire might have been the cause.
-
Some say that the Taliban are using the Stingers left over from
the anti-Soviet war. Pakistani newspapers received a video from
Al-Qaida which shows an F-16 being shot down by a stinger which
the video claims was indigenously produced.
-
Al-Qaida callng Pakistani papers also claims that the U.S. claim
of killing Islamic leader Abul Haitham Yemeni inside Pakistan,
using a pilotless plane, is false and Yemeni is alive. The drone
did fire but missed its target, they say.
-
On June 6, Pakistan handed over Maulvi Ahmed Talha, former
Taliban governor of Paktia, to the U.S. He had taken refuge in Pakistan.
-
June 15. In an "in-your-face" kind of interview with Pakistan's
indeprendent Geo TV, Taliban military commander Mullah Akhtar
Usmani said that BOTH Mullah Omar and Osama bin Laden are alive
and well and are living in areas of Afghanistan controlled by
the Taliban. The interview, according to GEO, was carried out
near Spin Voldak south of Kandahar.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
click here to email
a link to this
article
2005-06-25 Sat 19:34ct
NewTrendMag.org