Narrated Sa'd, r.a.:
The Prophet (ﷺ) visited me at Mecca while I was ill.
I said (to him), "I have property; May I bequeath all my
property in Allah's Cause?" He said, "No." I said, "Half of
it?" He said, "No." I said, "One third of it?" He said,
"One-third (is alright), yet it is still too much, for you'd
better leave your inheritors wealthy than leave them poor,
begging of others. Whatever you spend will be considered a
Sadaqa for you, even the mouthful of food you put in the
mouth of your wife. Anyhow Allah may let you recover, so
that some people may benefit by you and others be harmed by
you."
Sahih al-Bukhari 5354
Book 69, Hadith 4
Vol. 7, Book 64, Hadith 266
With thanks to Sis. Kristi
USA
What will America be like in a year?
Police shootings of young Black men on an ongoing basis.
Black communities being terrorized. Unable to respond owing
to lack of leadership.
Separating children, even babies, from mothers coming in
from central America and Mexico. The traumatized children
will not forget these horrors.
Recognizing Jerusalem as the capital of the criminal
entity known as Israel.
Increasing restrictions on Muslims.
Trump is becoming bolder every day and his excesses do not
damage him because there is a large race-oriented population
supporting him.
[From New Trend observer]
On facebook, Jamaat al-Muslimeen's page,
New Trend of June 10 reached
14520
people.
Most important items in this:
Police oppression & corruption in Baltimore.
Pakistan army admits connection with US in attacks on
mujahideen.
War News
Syria
People fleeing Deraa province as Regime advances.
IS re-entering Raqqa? Curfew imposed.
Assassins at work.
June 18- 24. Assad's troops with Iranian and Shia militias
is advancing east of Deraa, while Russian planes bomb the
population which is opposed to Assad.
23 civilians have been killed in the bombing, 6 women and 3
children. In the ground fighting 13 of Assad's troops and 15
Islamic fighters have been killed.
Assad's helicopters dropped 4 barrel bombs on Nahta town in
the same area.
Russia launched 26 air strikes. Terrified people have fled
from 7 villages as the regime forces advance. These
internally displaced persons from 7 villages number more
than 17,200.
June 24. [In the latest fighting in eastern Deraa province
counterattacks by mujahideed killed 5 of Assad's commanders
and 20 of his troops [not clear if they are Iranians or Shia
militias].
[America has reportedly told the opposition groups in Deraa
that it will not help them as the regime forces
advance.]
June 24: In an attack on al-Suwaida city, 2 members of
Assad's intelligence service were killed and several
wounded.
in Deir ez Zor, bombing by the US air force coalition
earlier in the week killed 7 civilians in al-Shafa town
along with 14 Islamic State fighters.
In Idlib province unidentified gunmen have killed more
people supporting al-Nusra. Trained assassins are wreaking
havoc in Idlib province and the opposition groups blame each
other misled by regime propaganda.
June 20. At the border of Deir ez Zor and Homs provinces, in
the desert Islamic State advanced again and inflicted heavy
losses on Iranians, Shia militias and other Shia forces.
Both sides are preparing for a major clash and the area has
been calm for 4 days.
Al-Raqqa, the former capital of the Islamic State [IS] is
facing infiltration by IS fighters coming back to attack SDF
which has the support of USA. Five SDF were killed on the
outskirts of al-Raqqa. In side the city, which wasreduced to
rubble by the US air force, locals trying to return are
clashing with SDF. Some firing by unidentified gunmen killed
4 SDF and injured 11. A large SDF force has been brought
into al-Raqqa and curfew has been imposed.
Iraq
Islamic Women Prisoners: New Turn. US strike kills 34 allies
by mistake. Turkey bombing PKK.
June 24: According to Middle East Monitor, ISIS has captured
6 Iraq regime security me and is offering to exchange them
for Islamic women in regime prisons. Amaq, the IS news
agency, according to the Monitor has posted a video of the 6
men who will bw executed if the women are not released.
Owing to misinformation between two Shia Iraqi commanders,
US air strikes hit shia forces killing 34. Here is a bit of
that conversatuin:
'Mohammadi, according to Husseini, "informed the Joint
Operations Command by mistake that the troops were deployed
1500 kilometers away from the borders, after one of the
commanders told him the information mistakenly. However, he
did not correct it."
[1500 km away? No wonder the US air strikes came in.
editor]]
Scattered guerrilla fighting continues in various parts of
northern and western Iraq.
Turkish jets have been bombing PKK positions in northern
Iraq. 35 PKK are reported killed.
Editorial
Breaking News:
Congratulation Mr. Erdogan. The Muslim world is proud of
you. He beat his closest rival by 22%. In parliament the
victory is even bigger though the secular party crossed the
10% mark.
Congratulations Jamaat e Islami Pakistan:
June 24. At a huge gathering in Peshawar, Jamaate Islami
leader Sirajul Haq, vowed to free Dr. Aafia Siddiqui from
the cluthches of the US, and also to help liberate Palestine
and Kashmir.
Why do many non-Muslims, particularly leftists, and middle
class Muslims, now support Palestine but Oppose
Mujahideen?
The reason behind this phenomenon needs Thorough Thinking
but is Paradoxically Simple.
by Kaukab Siddique
Many non-Muslims support Palestine. The reasons are quite
simple if one thinks about them. Let me break it down for
you.
The non-Muslims [and middle class Muslims] believe that
Israel is "safe." Militarily it is the strongest power in
the Middle East.
The United States supports Israel with all its power and
influence.
Notice that non-Muslims criticizing Israel and
sympathizing with :Palestinians are opposed to the
"settlements," not to all of Israel.
The Arab rulers have recognized Israel as a legitimate
entity. Egypt and Jordan have full diplomatic relations with
Israel. UAE is doing more for Israel than Egypt even without
diplomatic relations. Saudi Arabia is coy but has indirectly
recognized Israel.
All the rulers have agreed to what is known as a
"two-state solution." If only Israel accepts a client
Palestinian state, the rulers would be quite satisfied.
Iran is full of polemical statements against Israel but
its all talk. Ayatollah Khamenei recently clarified that the
claims that Israel would disappear were not to be taken
literally. Iran's most important ally Hizbullah did not stir
during THREE invasions of Gaza. In Syria, six of Hizbullah's
positions have been hit by Israel with no Hizbullah
response.
All sides among the rulers are sure that with USA's
support, Israel is safe. It cannot be overthrown.
America allows freedom of expression, so the professional
lefties cannot lose anything by criticizing Israel and
"supporting" :Palestine.
They are way ahead of the Palestinians who criticize
Israel.
There is a strong undercurrent of information that Hamas
too has accepted the "two nation" solution, sandwiched as it
is between Israel and Egypt..
Now let us see why all the rulers and superpowers are
opposed to the mujahideen. Every day the mujahideen are
bombed by both USA [Britain, France, Belgium, Australia,
Canada] and Russia with the help of Iran and Hizbullah.
Hundreds of thousands of Muslim civilians have been killed
by these powers. Entire Islamic cities have been reduced to
rubble, major ones among them Mosul, Raqqa, Douma and East
Aleppo.
Here are the reasons why none of these powers condemn the
slaughter of Muslims:
None of the mujahideen groups support Israel in the
slightest even though they have no tanks, long range
artillery and air force. They could have easily asked for
help as we might remember when the Jordanian King attacked
the Palestinians [in Black September] many of them fled to
Israel.
None of the mujahideen groups accept the legitimacy of
the superpowers, particularly of those who have come from
thousands of miles away to bomb them.
None of them accept the Arab rulers, be they kings,
dictators [or non-Arab sectarians like Iran.]
Most importantly, the world powers see the mujahideen as
capable of setting up a Caliphate. In fact they did set up a
mighty Caliphate from central Syria to northern Iraq.
They demolished the Iraq-Syria border set up by the western
powers and threatened the Saudi kingship.
The Caliphate panicked the western powers into breaking
all the rules of war and international relations. They
simply pounded the mujahideen with all they had,
slaughtering civilians and fighters alike [including 40,000
civilians killed in Mosul, reports the Independent]
The Caliphate was demonized by the western [global] media
to such an extent that many Muslims consider them no more
than gangsters and even non-Muslims. The media can attribute
any crime to them and no one asks for evidence.
Despite the slaughter of Muslims, the western powers
think that the emergence of the Caliphate is still possible
because small groups of fighters are not giving up and are
still willing to sacrifice their own lives without
hesitation.
So they keep pounding them, trying to kill every one of
them. Even Islamic women have been sentenced to death by the
same shia groups which executed Saddam Hussain.
So, whom would non-Muslim "radicals" [and middle class
Muslims] with their anti-war slogans support: Palestinians
who are helpless in front of Israel or mujahideen who
threaten to awaken the entire Muslim world against the
West?
Pakistan
Islamic Coalition Ready for Elections
by Qaiser Sharif
LAHORE, June 23; Secretary General, Jamaat e Islami, Liaqat
Baloch, who is also the Secretary General of the MMA, has
said that on the 25th of July, the people of Pakistan would
lay the foundations of an Islamic revolution leading towards
an Islamic and prosperous Pakistan.
Addressing corner meetings in NA 130 in the city, he said
that the MMA election manifesto was the harbinger of the
welfare of the masses and dignity and respect of the
national institutions. He said that in the past, the rulers
had brought disgrace at every forum but MMA's revolutionary
programme would restore the image of the country and the
nation in the comity of the nations.
Liaqat Baloch said that the MMA government would ensure free
treatment to the patients of five major diseases and also
bring down the prices of the food stuff and other items of
daily use. The prices of POL would also be lowered by
reducing taxes.
He said that the MMA government in the Khyber PK in the past
had been a model government in every respect and the people
of the province were praise for that even now.
He was confident that the MMA would achieve countrywide
victory in the elections and run the country according to
the wishes and aspirations of the people.
Palestinians Condole the Passing of their great Pakistani Friend
LAHORE, June 23; Leading Palestinian leaders including their
former Prime Minister and HAMAS chief Ismail Haniyya, have
expressed deep grief over the sad demise of Jamaat e
Islami's deputy chief Syed Muzaffar Hashmi and paid tributes
to him for his services for the liberation of Palestine and
Kashmir.
The HAMAS chief, in a condolence letter to the Ameer, Jamaat
e Islami, Pakistan, Senator Siraj ul Haq, said that Syed
Muzaffar Hashmi had been continuously raising his voice for
the rights of the oppressed people of Palestine and
Kashmir.
Chief of the Al-Quds International, Yasin Hamood, head of
the Ittehadul Ulema, Mauritania, and world fame scholar Dr
Muhammad Al-Hasan Aldada, and chief of the Hamas Lebanon,
Ali Barka, have also contacted the JI foreign affairs wing
to express their deep grief over the demise of Syed Musharaf
Hashmi and paid tributes for his services.
Bangladesh
Enforced Indebtedness to India & the Politics of Appeasement
in Bangladesh
Dr Firoz Mahboob Kamal
The on-going war against democracy
There are only two visible powers in the political landscape
of Bangladesh: the people of Bangladesh and the government
of India. The political history of Bangladesh is indeed
mostly the history of clash of these two powers. Before
1971, India had its incessant war to demolish the arch enemy
Pakistan in its eastern wing. After India's victory in 1971,
Pakistan's war has ended. But India's war hasn't. Rather, it
has received a new life, new objective and a new game-plan
against a new enemy in this strategic land so crucial to
India's destiny. Here, the Indian war is to crush the
democratic aspiration of 170 million people of Bangladesh.
Moreover, such a war has never been new in India; it is
already continuing for 70 years in Kashmir and in its
north-eastern provinces. And, it shows no sign to end in the
near future.
On its eastern backyard, India never showed its readiness to
tolerate a strong Pakistan-like neighbour. It wants only a
subservient weaker Bangladesh -like neighbouring Bhutan,
Nepal or melt-down Sikkim. In fact, such an Indian vision
has always been the guiding compass for its foreign policy
as well defence strategy vis-à-vis Bangladesh since its
creation in 1971. Whereas, the Bengali Muslims want
otherwise. They want to build a strong and independent
Bangladesh and play its civilizational role as the 3rd
largest Muslim country in the world. In fact, prior to 1947,
the Bengali Muslims -the largest Muslim population in the
subcontinent, played a crucial role to change the
geopolitics of South Asia by creating Muslim League and
Pakistan. Pakistan has been defeated in Bengal, but the
vision survives. Because of strong entrenchment in such
visionary premise, there starts an irreconcilable conflict
between two incompatible objectives of the two dissimilar
people. And such dissimilarity adds fuel to India's
obsession to crush the popular aspiration of the people of
Bangladesh. They can't see any acceptable alternative. To
its advantage, India is not alone in the war. It has ruling
Awami League as its partner. In fact, here lies the
pathology of the political crisis as well as India's second
phase of the old war in this war-torn country since its
inception in 1971.
India never kept it hidden that her geo-strategic interest
overrides the popular ambitions of the people of Bangladesh.
For the similar reason, Indian leaders couldn't accept the
democratic creation and the existence of Pakistan on its
both flanks since its creation in 1947. This is why, whoever
crushes the popular aspirations of the people of Bangladesh
-like the one-party autocratic ruler Shaikh Mujib, the
military junta General Ershad and the election fraudster
Shaikh Hasina, could be embraced as the close partner in
India's war in Bangladesh. In 1972, India withdrew its
troops, but didn't withdraw its embedded agents who have
been working for India's interest in civil, military, media,
cultural, political and intellectual arenas since 1947.
Moreover, during its military occupation in 1971-1972, India
could manipulate the pro-Indian government at Dhaka to
install a new army of collaborators in the defence and
security infrastructures of Bangladesh.
The enforced indebtedness
India could successfully enforce a sense of indebtedness
towards her political elites by its full scale war for the
creation of Bangladesh in 1971. Such an embedded sense of
indebtedness, has indeed reduced the sense of independence
in the psyche of the nationalist Bengalis. As a result, the
leaders of the ruling Awami League and its cronies take it
as a pleasure as well as a political obligation to give
license to India to interfere in the country's internal
affairs. In fact, they made it a precedence by inviting the
Indian Army inside Bangladesh in 1971. The legacy still
thrives in the political and intellectual arena.
The war of 1971 was not only against Pakistan, it gave India
a golden opportunity to enforce a deep sense of indebtedness
in the secularist Bengali psyche. The Bengali separatist
fighters -called Mukti Bahini, never had the moral strength
and the war-skills of the Afghan Islamist fighters. The
Afghan Islamists liberated every inch of their land from
Russian occupation without any helping foreign Army in their
land. Even the US Army with the help of 40 other states
couldn't control more than 30% of Afghanistan. Whereas,
Mukti Bahini couldn't liberate even a single district or a
sub-district on their own. They needed a full scale invasion
by the Indian Army, Air Force and Navy to do the job. After
its victory in the war, India could present Bangladesh -the
separated eastern wing of Pakistan, as a gift on a platter
to her submissive cronies.
As a result, Shaikh Mujib could be easily portrayed in India
as a recipient of an Indian gift -not as the father of a
nation. Thus, the third largest Muslim country in the world
could be indebted to an idol-worshipping kuffars for its
creation. As a mark of gratitude to India, the leaders of
the ruling Awami League consider it a solemn duty to express
such indebtedness by protecting Indian interest in
Bangladesh in every possible ways. In fact, such a sense of
indebtedness forms the basis of their policy of appeasement
towards India. This is why, India could get so easily the
transit through Bangladesh, access its sea ports, withdraw
waters from its international rivers and flood its market
with the Indian goods. Such pro-Indian collaboration has
other vile expressions: it is to vilify, torture, kill and
restrict the political rights of those who fought against
the Indian aggression in 1971. The ruling Awami League even
runs an incessant judicial and extrajudicial killing scheme
to exterminate them.
Indian claim of the fatherhood
Because of an embedded indebtedness to India, the pro-Indian
leaders of Bangladesh need to swallow even the most
unpalatable stuffs to appease her. The Indians too,
understand the helplessness of their collaborators; hence
look emboldened to openly claim even the fatherhood of
Bangladesh. Such a claim was made in public on 27.08.2008 to
celebrate the death anniversary of General Manek Shaw -the
Indian Army Chief during the war of 1971. The renowned Press
Trust of India published an article with the caption "Manek
Shaw: A Soldier Who Created a Nation". In that article,
General Manek Shaw and not Shaikh Mujib has been projected
as the father of Bangladesh. It is noteworthy that the
ruling Awami League and its pro-Indians coalition partners
didn't raise a single voice of protest against such a robust
derogatory and demeaning claim made so publicly in the
prominent Indian media!
Such a claim indeed bulldozes the pride as well the core
essence of Awami League's politics -as they claim Mujib as
the father of Bangladesh. The Indians frame their argument
on the basis that General Manek Shaw (later on honoured as
Field Marshal) and his Army fought a full-fledged war
against Pakistan for creating Bangladesh. Thousands of
Indian soldiers had to die in the war. India spent billions
of dollar to bear the cost of the war. In comparison, Shaikh
Mujib didn't even declare any intention of independence
publicly. Rather, he fought the general election in 1970
with the promise of framing a constitution of a strong and
united Pakistan - as expressed in his party's election
manifesto. He even sat with President Yahiya of Pakistan to
reach a political deal.
Politics of appeasement & the new low
The politics of appeasement unto India has attained a new
low in Bangladesh. In fact, it has turned to overt slavery
of India. Politics is an art cum science of effectively
running a state, safeguarding its interest and causing
maximum benefit to its people. But in politics of slavery,
the prime objective is to serve the geopolitical interest of
the master; therefore, security and welfare of the state and
its people get ignored. In an independent politics, who
should be in power is the sole and sovereign issue of the
people of the sovereign country. But in slavery, that is not
the case. It becomes a subject to be decided by the foreign
powers. This is why, it becomes a major issue in the
political circles of Bangladesh to look at Indian
preferences vis-à-vis who should come to the power in their
country.
Such a sense of slavery towards India is expressed very
candidly by Mr Iqbal Sobhan Chowdhury -the adviser to
Bangladesh Prime Minister Shaikh Hasina on information
affairs. In a seminar in Dhaka Press Club on 28th May 2018,
he told that India on her own interest will want the ruling
Awami League in power. He emphasised that India can't allow
the anti-Awami League forces to win in any election in
Bangladesh. In the past, Mr Pranab Mukharjee -the
ex-President of India, reinforced the same view by a
categorical statement that Bangladesh will not be allowed to
slip away any more from the domain of the Indian radar. To
support his expectation, Mr Iqbal Sobhan Chowdhury argued
that Awami League government is helping India in her war
against the separatist forces in the north-eastern seven
Indian states. He told, India has to invest heavily both
militarily and financially to fight the separatist forces in
Kashmir. India would have collapsed economically if it had
to fight similar war in her seven north-eastern states.
Mr Chowdhury gives credit to Awami League government's zero
tolerance against the separatist forces in those
North-Eastern Indian states that helped India to avoid such
a collapse. Therefore, he believes, India has no other
option but to keep Shaikh Hasina in power. However, he
didn't mention that such zero tolerance against those
liberation movements is indeed an expression of full
submission to Indian agenda. It is also an expression of
zero morality vis-à-vis the democratic rights of the
oppressed people of those states. Such zero morality of the
Bangladesh government is also expressed through its Kashmir
policy. Whereas, it is an internal matter of the people of
the Indian states to decide whether they want to stay in
India or get independence. Only the politics of slavery unto
India can deny such rights of those people.
Mr Iqbal Sobhan Chowdhury understands the incapacitating
helplessness of his own party -as well as that of other
stakeholders in Bangladeshi politics. Hence, the Indian
preferences in the forthcoming election looks so important
to him. Moreover, Mr Iqbal Sobhan Chowdhury is also aware of
India's on-going crisis and the vulnerabilities. It can't
afford losing a protected market of 170 million people. He
is also aware that India can't accommodate a strong
Bangladesh on its border. He also understands that only
Awami League can give sustenance to Bangladesh's sense of
indebtedness cum a state of bonded enslavement to India.
Hence, he could tell so frankly and confidently that India
must see Awami League in power in future election for its
own interest. His statement also reinforces the common
belief that India has the full manipulating power to
influence the outcome of any election in Bangladesh. And,
like any pro-Indian Bengali nationalist, he too, shows the
tip of a huge moral deprivation. If he had an iota of
self-esteem, he would have asked himself: why should India
have a wish vis-à-vis who should stay in power in
Bangladesh? Why such an Indian preference should get
importance in Bangladesh's internal matters? It's indeed an
exact expression of the slavish mentality of the Bengali
political pets who rely on the masters to decide their fate.
Because of them, the opinion of the Bangladeshi people are
not counted in the general election and a fake election
becomes such a necessity.
Indian collusion & the guaranteed victory of Hasina
Recently, Shaikh Hasina finished her India tour. Since her
meeting with the Indian Prime Minister Mr Norendra Modi
couldn't yield anything for Bangladesh, she now talks like a
philanthropist. Recently, she told the press at Dhaka that
she loves giving and dislikes begging. She also mentioned
that she has given so such to India that can never be
forgotten. It is indeed the usual expression of the
deep-rooted indebtedness that India could instil in the
secular Bengali psyche through its intervention in 1971. In
fact, the war in 1971 was a political necessity of India to
engineer an intellectual, cultural and political conversion
among the secular Bengalis. The feeling of deep indebtedness
to India is indeed the product of such a inner conversion.
Because of that, serving the Indian strategic interests in
Bangladesh has become a political obsession among the
Bengali nationalists. Hence, Hasina is not an exception. In
fact, the conversion is so profound that many of them even
say in seminars that if the bondage with India is severed,
Bangladesh will again become a part of Pakistan.
Such a sense of deep indebtedness has indeed inculcated the
political, the ideological and the cultural submission to
India. So, the influential Indian Bengali daily the Ananda
Bazar could gleefully report that the Bengali New Year
celebration in Dhaka looks more like a Hindu puja
celebration in Kolkata. Shaikh Hasina feels proud of that.
It is indeed the marker of hindu'isation of the Bengali
Muslim culture. Shaikh Hasina has given free license to
India to launch such an ideological cum cultural invasion.
She is repackaging such a service cum submission to India as
philanthropy. Now, it is obvious that Shaikh Hasina and her
comrades can't come out of such a life-long bondage
-enshrined in the name of indebtedness. So, the people of
Bangladesh have to pay heavily for Indian involvement in war
in 1971. No doubt, India will continue to cash on it in the
future. This is indeed the price that Bangladesh has to pay
for inviting an opportunistic India in its midst in 1971. It
is indeed the ugliest moral and political failure of the
people who led independence of Bangladesh.
There is no doubt that what Hasina has given to India is
unprecedented in the history of Bangladesh. India couldn't
even think of that in the past -even during her father's
time. It is also true that India would not forget such an
exceptional servitude of Hasina. But she should also know
that better slavery never helps get free from the bondage of
slavery, rather earns new role to serve the new agenda of
the master. In such context, Shaikh Hasina has already
earned a new role as the collaborator in India's war in its
seven North-Eastern states and the executioner of the
Islamists in Bangladesh. Since 1971, Bangladesh has served
so much the geopolitical cum economic interest of India, but
India never paid back to benefit the people of Bangladesh.
On the contrary, it has done everything only to give more
mileage to the rule of its own stooges. Hasina also
understands India's predicament. Since India has no other
better substitute, she would be the sole beneficiary of the
Indian collusion in election in Bangladesh. It gives her an
extra confidence in her eminent election victory in 2018 -as
repeatedly expressed in her recent speech.
Since election is at the doorsteps, Shaikh Hasina needs to
tell people about her deep Indian connection with a strong
political purpose. She gives such lectures not for any
Indian audience, these are only for the domestic
consumption. This is why, she delivers such lecture only in
Dhaka, and not in Delhi. She wants to warn the people of
Bangladesh that India is definitely on her side; hence her
victory in the forthcoming election is guaranteed. Nobody
can undo that. Conspicuously, free and fair election is not
the subject in her political sermons. Her adviser Mr Iqbal
Sobhan Chowdhury told the same stuff in a seminar in Dhaka
Press Club. Such lecture has an implicit intimidating
message for those who dare oppose Hasina's rule. Such
intimidation is done intentionally to demotivate and
demoralise them. It works as a strong deterrence against
people's power. Hence for the opposition parties, the
message is clear. Since Hasina is going to stay in power,
they have no way to avoid her punishing wrath.
Fake election: a tool of state-run terror
Fake election has always been the most favourite tool to
legitimise the rule of terror in Bangladesh -as has been the
case in Syria, Egypt and other autocracies in the world.
Power-addict Hasina abolished the consensus formula of the
election under a caretaker government only to use it as a
tool to defeat the aspiration of the people. Her wrath is
well known: the brutalities in the police custody, the
physical abuse on the street by her party hooligans, the
fabricated criminal cases in the court, the judicial and the
extra-judicial killings and the enforced disappearances cum
death are its usual features. These are indeed the powerful
weapons to force the people to a total surrender.
Such a state-run terror has tremendous power not only to
silence the people's voice but also to damage their moral
power. In state of deep despair, a ray of new hope is very
essential to generate an effective political force. Hence,
crushing such a hope in the pubic mind is the most common
objective of all brutal autocrats. They use the massive tool
of the state-owned terror to kill such hope and drive people
out of the political arena. The British colonialists ruled
Bengal for 190 years by generating such hopelessness by
using the massive military power. However, they didn't have
fake elections. But Hasina has an advantage. Along with the
state-owned tools of terror, she deploys fake election to
impose the same subjugation more cunningly and more
deceivingly. 23.06.2018 Tweet:@drfmkamal;
facebook.com/firozkamal
Guidance
[Extra terrestrial beings?]
The Jinn Too Worship Allah along with good humans like the
Prophet, pbuh.
~Courtesy Sis Yasmin ~
The Quraan and Sunnah indicate that the Jinn exist !
and that there is a purpose for their existence in this
life.
{which is to worship Allaah Alone with no partner
or associate.}
ALLAH {Azza Wa Jall} says...
'And I (Allah) created not the Jinns and Humans,
except they should worship Me (Alone).'
['Source~ 'Quran' Surat al-Dhaariyaat~ 51: A #56].
Abd-Allaah ibn Abbaas {Allah have mercy on him} said:
~ Prophet Mohammad~
(Peace and Blessings of Allaah be upon him)
went out with a group of his Companions heading for
the marketplace of 'Ukaaz'.
{ This was when the 'Shayaateen' were prevented from
getting any news from heaven, and shooting stars had
been sent against them ! }
The 'Shayaateen' went back to their people,
who said, What is the matter with you ?
They said...
'We cannot get news from heaven,
and shooting stars were sent against us'.
Their people said...
'Nothing is stopping you from hearing news from heaven
except some new event that must have happened.
Go and look in the east and the west of the earth,
and see if you can find out what it is that is stopping you
from hearing news from Heaven'.
Those who went out in the direction of 'Tihaamah' came upon
the Prophet
{Peace and Blessings of Allaah be upon him}
in 'Nakhlah', when he was on his way to 'Ukaaz',
and found him leading his Companions in the
'Fajr' Prayer.
When they heard the 'Quraan', they listened to it and
said...
'By Allaah, this is what is stopping us from hearing
news from heaven '
When they went back to their people, they said...
'O our people, we have heard a wonderful Recital
{the 'Quraan}'
It guides to the Right Path, and we have believed therein,
and we shall never join (in worship) anything with our
Lord Allaah.
[ Source: 'Quran'~ Surat al-Jinn 72: A #1 ]
Then Allaah revealed to His Prophet
{Peace and Blessings of Allaah be upon him}
'Say O Muhammad
It has been revealed to me that a group of Jinns
listened
(to this 'Quraan')
and Allaah revealed to him what the Jinn had said.'
['Source~ Quran~ Surat al-Jinn 72: A #2].
{Source ~ reported by Al-Bukhaari Volume 7 Hadith # 731}
~My 'Salaams' To All ~
~Courtesy Sis Yasmin ~
"All that is on earth will Perish. But will abide
{Forever}
the Face of thy Lord, full of Majesty, Bounty and
Honour"
{'Quran'- Surah Al-Rahman-55.26-27 }
